Member III
The width of the scale permits many ways of examination: |
first, the extension of the meanings of the terms (of which more is said
later), that is to say that goodness not only extends to its physical meaning
but also to its ethical one (similarly applicable to greatness and the others);
second by duplication of them in their concrete and abstract forms, so to speak,
goodness and good, greatness and great; third by distinctions of -ivi, -abilis, and -are, for example, bonificativum
[the capacity of goodness or to do good], bonificabile
[the capacity to receive goodness or to be improvable], bonificare [to improve, reclaim, restore], where ivum signifies the active principal
part, abile the passive principal
part, and are the copulative
principal part, or ivum the principal
effective or communicative part, abile the
principal receptive or participatory part, and are the principal connective or actual part; fourth, by
distinctions of affirmative and negative, additive and subtractive, thus to the
extent that one can be said to be taken affirmatively, the other is take
negatively, where one is excessive, the other is deficient; fifth, by
distinctions of explicit and implicit, because they are in terms not solely
contained in their system, but also everything that can be said and imagined
through absolute predicates, as is made clear in the Tract Regarding the Multiplication of the Terms; sixth by
distinction of proper and appropriated, insofar as some of these have a natural
convenience, some by and from themselves [per
se & a se, instrinsically], others
extrinsically and from others, some I say are from natural substance, some from
infusion, some from acquisition.
No comments:
Post a Comment